माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय ने उत्तर प्रदेश में बिना टीईटी के शिक्षा मित्रों को समायोजित कर शिक्षक बनाने से सम्बंधित मामले पर रोक : अन्य बिन्दुओं पर हुए निर्णय के अदालती आदेश की प्रति देखें |

माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय ने उत्तर प्रदेश में बिना टीईटी के शिक्षा मित्रों को समायोजित कर शिक्षक बनाने से सम्बंधित मामले पर रोक : अन्य बिन्दुओं पर हुए निर्णय के अदालती आदेश की प्रति देखें |

यह आदेश हिमांशु राणा की रिट पेटिशन (सिविल)-167/2015 में आई0ए0 2 और 3 पर दिया गया।

ITEM NO.301+302

COURT NO.5

SECTION XI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F
I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4347-4375/
2014STATE OF U.P & ORS Appellant(s)

VERSUS

SHIV KUMAR PATHAK & ORS Respondent(s)WITHI.A. Nos.292, 293, 294 and 295 in Civil AppealNo(s).4347-4375/2014SLP(C) No. 62/2014(With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 1672/2014(With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 1674/2014(With Office Report)C.A. No. 4376/2014(With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 11671/2014(With appln.(s) for de-tagging and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 11673/2014(With Office Report)W.P.(C) No. 135/2015(With Office Report)CONMT.PET.(C) No. 199/2015 In C.A. No. 4347-4375/2014(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 14386/2015(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to submit additional document(s) and Interim Relief and
Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 10408/2014(With appln.(s) for impleadment and Office Report)W.P.(C) No. 167/2015(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) fordirections and Office Report)I.A. No.2 & 3 in W.P.(C) No.167/2015(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report)CONMT.PET.(C) No. 399/2015 In C.A. No. 4347-4375/2014 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Date : 06/07/2015

These appeals were called on for hearing today.Gulshan Kumar Arora
Date: 2015.07.07 17:07:43 IST

Reason:

CORAM : HON'BLE

MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA

HON'BLE

MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

2 For Appellant(s) Mr. R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv.Mr. Satya Mitra Garg, AORMrs. Manju Aggarwal Singh, Adv.Mrs. Neelam Singh, Adv.Mr. Garvesh Kabra, AORMs. Preetika Dwivedi, AORMs. Apporva Garg, Adv.Mr. Anish Agarwal, Adv.Mr. Vandana Sharma Bhandari, Adv.Ms. Shikha Tyagi, Adv.Dr. Kailash Chand, AORMr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, AOR Cont.P.399/15 Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv.Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv.Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv.Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv.CC No.10408/14 Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Adv.Mr. R.K. Singh, Adv.Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Adv.Mr. B.N. Dubey, Adv.Mr. Umeshchandra Mohanti, Adv.Mr. S. Sajith P.,

Adv.For Respondent(s)

Mr. L. Nageshwar Rao, Adv.Mr. Amit Pawan, AOR Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Adv.Mr. Anand Nandan, Adv.Mr. Suryadaya Prakash Tiwari, Adv.Mr. Abhishek A., Adv.Mrs. Priyanka Swami, Adv.Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv.Mr. Prashant Shukla, Adv.Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AORMr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv.Mr. Abhishek Srivastava, Adv.Mr. Anay Srivastava, Adv.Mr. Vikrant Singh Bias, Adv.Mrs. K. Sarada Devi, AORFor NCTE Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Adv.` Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv.Mr. P. Singhdev, Adv.3Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Adv.Dr. Monika Gusain, AORMr. Hari Om Yaduvandhi, Adv.Ms. Geeta Singh, Adv.Mr. Gopal Singh, AORMr. M.P. Jha, AORMr. P.N. Ramalingam, Adv.Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, AORMr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AORMr. Vishwa Pal Singh, AOR

SLP 62/14 Mr. M.R. Shamshad, AOR Mr. Ahmad S. Azhar, Adv.Mr. Aditya Sarma, Adv.Mr. Anupam Mishra, AORMr. Simanta Kumar, Adv.Mr. Vinodkumar K., Adv.Mr. Shreepal Singh, Adv.Ms. Rachana Srivastava, Adv.Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv.Mr. Nishit Agrawal, Adv.Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, Adv.Mr. Talha A. Rehman, Adv.Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai, Adv.Mr. Brijender Chahar, Sr. Adv.Mr. S.C. Maheshwari, Sr. Adv.Mr. Jayant Mehta, Adv.Mr. Susheel Tomar, Adv.Ms. Nikhar Berry, Adv.Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv.Mr. D.S. Parmar, Adv.Mr. Prashant Shukla, Adv.Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Adv.Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv.Mr. Ajay Jain, Adv.Mr. Jinendra Jain, Adv.Mr. R.P. Kaushal, Adv.4Mr. Abhishek Jain, Adv.Mr. Rohit Singh, AORMr. Kartik Prasad, Adv.Mr. vikrant Singh Bais, Adv.Mr. vivek Singh, Adv.Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv.Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER Hearing resumed.

Let the matter be listed for further hearing at 2.00 p.m. on27.07.2015.

Mr. Venkataramani, learned senior counsel for the State shallfile a convenience volume. He shall also file the Rules that is in vogue in other States.

We have given the direction for production of the Rules solely for the purpose of perusal.

I.A. NOS.2 & 3 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.167 OF 2015

Mr. Anand Nandan, learned counsel for the applicant, has submitted that Shiksha Mitras who have not passed the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) have been appointed as teachers in schools contrary to the guidelines issued by the NCTE and also contrary to the Rules framed by the State. He has drawn our attention to the letter No.2253/ 79-5-2014-282/98 dated 19th June, 2014 issued by the Secretary, Basic Education, Government of U.P. On a scrutiny of the same, we find that there is no mention of passing of the eligibility test.

However, there is a direction for appointment of Shiksha Mitras in the post of Assistant Teachers in schools being run by the U.P. Basic Education Council.

The learned counsel for the State shall file an affidavit inrespect of the said letter within ten days hence.The affidavit shall contain the details as to how many ShikshaMitras have been appointed without passing the TET.

The Secretary and the Special Secretary of the Basic Education, Government of UP shall remain personally present at 2.00 p.m. on 27.07.2015 failing which, they will be liable for contempt of this Court.

Needless to emphasise,

the State Government shall not appoint any Shiksha Mitras, who have not qualified in the TET on the post of the Assistant Teacher.

Dasti order permitted.

(Gulshan Kumar Arora)
Court Master
(H.S. Parasher)
Court Master

आभार/साभार : डॉ विवेकानन्द त्रिपाठी/डीबी द्विवेदी जी/महेन्द्र कुमार पटेल जी